Continental Criticism of English Rifle Bullets
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Too-many-bullets spoil the broth (slightly modified English proverb)
hsr Proceedings in intensive care and cardiovascular anesthesia 2011, Vol. 3 Corresponding author: Prof. Michael John Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Via Olgettina, 48 20132 Milan, Italy e-mail: [email protected] never have more than four bullet points per slide and each point should be written, wherever possible, on one line to simplify and speed up reading. Bullet points are preferable ...
متن کاملRIFLE is alive: long live RIFLE
Diagnosis and classification of acute kidney injury was addressed systematically only 8 years ago when the classification called RIFLE (acronym of Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function and End stage Kidney disease describing progressive severity of renal damage) was created. Since then, several studies have tried to apply, validate, criticize and modify this initial scheme: as a matter of fac...
متن کاملCriticism of Benacerraf’s Criticism of Modern Eleatics
I analyze here Benacerraf’s criticism of Thomson arguments on the impossibility of ω-supertasks. Although Benacerraf’s criticism is well founded, his analysis of Thomson’s lamp is incomplete. In fact, it is possible to consider a new line of argument, which Benacerraf only incidentally considered, based on the functioning laws of the lamp. This argument leads to a contradictory result that comp...
متن کاملRIFLE is not RIFLE: on the comparability of results
Page 1 of 2 (page number not for citation purposes) In the consensus RIFLE criteria [1] of acute kidney injury (AKI) the thresholds given for serum creatinine (sCr) increase and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decrease (Table 1) do not correspond [2]. Direct measurement of GFR in clinical practice is difficult, and values are more often estimated (eGFR) by the Cockroft-Gault equation or the Mo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1899
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.1995.752